Author: Pedro José Godínez Hurtado
It is no secret to anyone that there has been an enormous shift in public policy regarding regulatory compliance within the customs and foreign trade sector, where the regulatory squeeze is even more evident due to a series of controls introduced throughout the year.
Recent customs reforms in Mexico reveal a profound transformation: the Mexican State (not to mention the enormous pressures from the international financial system) has left behind reactive review models in order to establish an ecosystem of proactive, technology-driven, real-time oversight.
In my view, 2026 will go down in history as one of the key years in which regulation became truly strict, in line with various international frameworks, forcing countless companies to enter state-of-the-art formality and foreign trade registries. The issue is that legal defense against omissions has become significantly more expensive, since today a single customs defense before the courts is not an effective solution to these diverse challenges.
The question I would like to put to other business owners and taxpayers engaged in foreign trade, and not only to fellow lawyers, is: how did we get here? And what does the future hold for us, as users of the customs system, amid so many changes?
As I mentioned earlier, severe penalties and litigation risk have increased dramatically for business taxpayers with weak compliance frameworks.
This reality hits especially hard for companies that use various foreign trade models, which now face suffocating scrutiny of their operations, partners and supply chains.
The most relevant of these include, among others, the following:
In the transition toward 2027, one of the most aggressive fronts is the update of the Anti-Money Laundering Law (LFPIORPI) in customs matters. The provision of foreign trade services by customs brokers and customs agencies is a vulnerable activity (Article 17, Section XIV of the LFPIORPI) when it involves certain types of goods (vehicles, jewelry, metals, works of art, armoring, etc.), and the recent amendment to its Regulations and the new General Rules radically change the situation for those who carry out vulnerable activities. Simple report filing is being abandoned in favor of a Risk-Based Approach (RBA), forcing companies to mandatorily implement assessment methodologies, classify their clients and update their internal manuals.
With a transition period beginning on November 30, 2026, the real challenge will arrive on March 1, 2027, the date on which automated monitoring systems, audits and enhanced due diligence will become mandatory.
In this same area, operational rigidity becomes extreme with the new obligation to report, within a maximum of 24 hours, any attempted suspicious or unconsummated transaction.
In addition, monitoring of the six-month accumulation of transactions is now stricter, requiring immediate notice as soon as the threshold is approached, without waiting for the end of the semester.
Added to this is the exclusion of tax payments from the calculation of these thresholds and relentless scrutiny, backed by law, to identify the Ultimate Beneficial Owner and permanently monitor Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs).
It is definitely no cliché that so many law firms are so emphatic about this first mechanism.
For its part, the foreign trade ecosystem is undergoing a complete restructuring under the amendments to the Customs Law in force this year.
The integration of the comprehensive “Electronic File” now requires importers to include minimum documentation such as contracts, CFDI (electronic invoices), value analyses, proof of transfers and payments of incrementables.
The environment becomes even more emphatic in penalizing irregularities by establishing full joint and several liability for customs brokers regarding the accuracy of the data, transforming their lifetime licenses into 20-year concessions with recertification every three years, and applying fines of up to 300% for omitted contributions or false data.
The customs outlook for next year is even more challenging due to the 2027 Economic Package initiative currently under review by the Chamber of Deputies, which seeks to tackle undervaluation head-on.
If approved, this proposal could remove the 50% threshold that previously applied to precautionary seizures, granting customs authorities the power to carry out seizures immediately upon any difference detected between the value declared by the importer and the price assigned by the authority.
As financial journalist Dainzú Patiño rightly points out in an article in the popular financial newspaper “Expansión”, a change of that magnitude, applied nationwide and across the board, threatens to cause severe logistical delays and cost overruns, particularly affecting industries that operate their supply chains under the Just in Timemodel, with the imminent risk of overloading bonded facilities at customs.
Moreover, these customs and anti-money laundering measures are complemented by tax developments with indirect impact that accelerate corporate penalties. The Federal Tax Code (CFF) now empowers the SAT (Tax Administration Service) to conduct express home audits, lightning audits that, if not refuted by the taxpayer within just five days, result in the immediate restriction of digital invoicing seals. In parallel, the Second Resolution of Amendments to the 2026 RGCE (General Foreign Trade Rules), published in September of this year, adds operational pressure by setting new specifications on fines for lack of labeling and establishing strict grounds for resolving suspensions in the Electronic Customs System (SEA) arising from errors in the NICO (Commercial Identification Number) within the SNICE (National Foreign Trade Information Service) platform... What a number of acronyms! The trend toward ultra-specialization of the field is evident, and it serves as a prelude to the final question.
The tightening of tax and customs policies in 2026 has laid the foundations for a relentless oversight State, and projections for 2027 point to an unprecedented level of sanction-driven demands.
In the humble opinion of the author, this scenario makes large-scale foreign trade an even more complex niche for merchants seeking to formalize and institutionalize their operations, even discouraging the transition to full legality and indirectly encouraging an increase in informality.
To survive in this ecosystem, foreign trade companies must internalize that regulatory compliance is no longer a mere administrative formality, but the fundamental strategic shield that will prevent operational shutdowns, immediate seizures and costly litigation that could jeopardize their profitability and continuity.
Contact:
📩 https://www.linkedin.com/in/pedro-jos%C3%A9-godinez-hurtado/
Pedro José Godínez Hurtado
Partner, Corporate and Real Estate Law Practice at Hernández, Godínez & Martínez Abogados, S.C.
#ForeignTrade #Customs #Compliance #HGAbogados
Other articles of interest and opinion references for this blog:
October 19, 2026
RELEVANT POINTS
October 19, 2026
The most recent changes in laws and regulations, issues of national and international interest and emerging trends in the legal world that directly impact our clients and their industries.
It is no secret to anyone that the enormous shift in public policy regarding regulatory compliance within the customs and
Historically, the trust has constituted a fundamental legal instrument in Mexico for the structuring of assets and real estate developments, based on its ability to provide
The new framework redefines tax defense and regulatory compliance for your company’s Vulnerable Activities.
Receive our latest
legal updates
OUR LOCATIONS
We have offices strategically located in the most important cities of Mexico, to provide better and greater support to our customers.
